Impaired Driving Solutions - Lawyer Brian Starkman DUI/DWI (Ontario)

Over 80 DUI/DWI (Ontario)

Impaired Driving Lawyer – Brian Starkman




Brampton Office
17 Ray Lawson Blvd., Unit 4, Brampton, Ontario L6Y 5L7.

Etobicoke Office
5146 Dundas Street West, Etobicoke, Ontario M9A 1C2

St. Catharines & Niagara Office
154 James Street (2nd Floor) St. Catharines, ON L2R 5C4

Orangeville Office
229 Broadway, Unit 6, Orangeville, Ontario L9W 2K1


This is the most well known of the drinking and driving offences. However, misconceptions abound regarding what the allegation really entails. The prosecution must prove that the driver’s ability to operate a motor vehicle was impaired by alcohol. The Crown does not need to prove that any such impairment by alcohol had a noticeable effect on the driving of the accused. Moreover, one need not be over the legal limit of alcohol to be impaired by alcohol. If you have a low tolerance for alcohol, you may be convicted of impaired operation of a motor vehicle even if your breath samples were below the legal limit. Indeed, you could have no alcohol in your system and still be convicted of impaired driving if the prosecution can prove that impairment was as a result of the ingestion of drugs (legal or otherwise). 

An experienced lawyer who focusses on impaired driving cases will help you reach your goal of a dismissal of your charge. Thorough and effective cross examination of police witnesses is the key to success for an impaired driving allegation. An experienced cross examiner will know what questions to ask and just as importantly what questions not to ask, so as to avoid bringing out information that is harmful to the case.

Sometimes an accused person will have an explanation as to why they may have appeared under the influence of alcohol when they really were not. For example, after a significant motor vehicle accident, a driver will often exhibit many of the same symptoms they might if they were impaired i.e. slurred speech, unsteadiness on feet. Again, an experienced lawyer can effectively bring out these alternative explanations with an eye towards creating reasonable doubt in the mind of the judge.